Skip to main content

The Atacama toad (Rhinella atacamensis) exhibits an unusual clinal pattern of decreasing body size towards more arid environments

Abstract

Background

The causes of geographic variation of body size in ectotherms have generally been attributed to environmental variables. Research in amphibians has favored mechanisms that involve water availability as an explanation for the geographic variation of body size. However, there are few studies at intraspecific level on amphibians that inhabit desert or semi-desert environments, where hydric restrictions are stronger. Here, we describe and inquire as to the causes of the geographic variation of body size in the semi-desert toad Rhinella atacamensis, a terrestrial anuran that is distributed over 750 km along a latitudinal aridity gradient from the southern extreme of the Atacama Desert to the Mediterranean region of central Chile. We measured the snout-vent length of 315 adults from 11 representative localities of the entire distribution of the species. Then, using an information-theoretic approach, we evaluate whether the data support eight ecogeographic hypotheses proposed in literature.

Results

Rhinella atacamensis exhibits a gradual pattern of decrease in adult body size towards the north of its distribution, where the climate is more arid, which conforms to a Bergmann’s cline. The best model showed that the data support the mean annual precipitation as predictor of body size, favoring the converse water availability hypothesis.

Conclusions

Most studies in amphibians show that adult size increases in arid environments, but we found a converse pattern to expected according to the hydric constraints imposed by this type of environment. The evidence in R. atacamensis favors the converse water availability hypothesis, whose mechanism proposes that the foraging activity determined by the precipitation gradient has produced the clinal pattern of body size variation. The variation of this trait could also be affected by the decreasing productivity that exists towards the north of the species distribution. In addition, we found evidence that both pattern and mechanism are independent of sex. Lastly, we suggest that behavioral traits, such as nocturnal habits, might also play an important role determining this differential response to aridity. Therefore, the support for the converse water availability hypothesis found in this study shows that amphibians can respond in different ways to water restrictions imposed by arid environments.

Background

Geographic variation holds a central role in evolution since it is related to the nature of species and the speciation process [1]. This variation may be present as discrete units or geographic gradients and related to the climate or the biogeographic history of the species [1, 2]. The tendencies presented as spatial gradients have been identified as ecogeographic rules [3, 4]. Among these, the relation between body size and environmental variables stands out [5], since body size is a trait strongly linked to the ecology and evolution of organisms [6]. The most studied generalization about geographic variation of body size is Bergmann’s rule [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. This rule proposes that, among closely related endotherms, body size increases with lower temperatures since animals with larger body size have less heat exchange with the environment (lower area-volume ratio), and thus will be able to conserve heat in colder areas [7] (translation in supplementary material of [15]). However, latitude has traditionally been the predictor of body size due to its high correlation with temperature at large scales [16, 17].

Distinction between pattern and mechanism is key when dealing with ecogeographic rules [16, 18]. In the case of the Bergmann’s rule, it is necessary that temperature and its conservation mechanism be identified in the study system. When the pattern of increase in body size with latitude is present, but the mechanism is different to heat conservation, it has been proposed to use the term Bergmann’s size cline instead [19]. Thus, several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this and other geographic patterns of body size in ectotherms, among which the most frequent are related to heat balance [20, 21], water availability [22, 23], resource availability [24, 25], environment seasonality [26] and life-history attributes [27]. This variety of proposed mechanisms highlights the difficulties associated with providing conclusive evidence for any of them [28].

The study of these mechanisms in amphibians has favored explanations mainly related to water availability [22, 23, 28,29,30], given their strong dependence on water due to the permeability of their skin [31]. This has led to the formulation and evaluation of mechanisms that predict different body size variation patterns related to hydric constrains (Table 1). One important contribution in this context was to consider that thermal and water balance are related (e.g. water loss from the surface leads to a simultaneous heat loss). This relationship suggests that a better descriptor of body size would involve a measure of water loss through the skin, as well as the energy present in the environment (potential evapotranspiration) instead of temperature or water availability by themselves [29]. However, these hypotheses have seldom been evaluated formally at intraspecific level in species distributed in aridity gradients.

Table 1 Hypotheses proposed in literature to explain the geographic variation of body size in amphibians

Other important factors that influence geographic tendencies of body size in amphibians are their geographic context and habitat preferences [29, 32,33,34]. For example, amphibians from desert or semi-desert environments will likely respond to the pressures imposed by aridity and large daily temperature variation with morphological and/or behavioral adaptations [35]. By contrast, in lineages of aquatic amphibians it is expected that the effect of water availability on body size will be irrelevant [29]. Thus, amphibians of desert and semi-desert environments offer the opportunity to study the effects of water availability on the geographic variation of body size. Nevertheless, there are still few intraspecific studies that have used species that inhabit this kind of environment as models [22, 36, 37] and none have explicitly evaluated ecogeographic hypotheses.

The Atacama Desert, located in the extreme north of Chile, is considered one of the driest places on the planet [38]. Although it is postulated that the extreme aridity of this desert originated in the late Miocene [39], its current climatic conditions would have been installed during the Plio-Pleistocene [40]. The only amphibian that has colonized the extreme south of the Atacama Desert is the Atacama toad (Rhinella atacamensis), a terrestrial species endemic to the semi-desert zone of Chile. Its distribution extends latitudinally over more than 750 km from the desert (25°S) to the Mediterranean zone of the center of the country (32°S), in a climatic transition zone in which precipitation (means of the localities of the extreme north and south vary between 14 to 228 mm/year; Fig. 1A) and productivity gradually increase southwards, while seasonality is accentuated [41, 42]. In much of its distribution is sympatric with Pleurodema thaul, but only R. atacamensis is distributed in the most arid part of this range (25–27°S), hence it is considered a true desert inhabitant [43,44,45]. It was originally thought that this species was restricted to a few isolated localities between Paposo (Antofagasta Region) and the Huasco River (Atacama Region) (25–29°S), where it lives closely associated with water systems (some of which have a very small extension), but subsequently its distribution was considerably expanded to the south (~ 32°S, Coquimbo Region; reviewed in [45]).

Fig. 1
figure1

Sampling localities and body sizes (snout-vent length, SVL) of Rhinella atacamensis. A Geographic location of the 11 localities included in this study (numbers given in Table 2). Colors represent different levels of precipitation (mean annual precipitation) and the dashed line delimits the approximate distribution of the species. B Geographic variation of body size (mean and standard deviation of SVL of each locality) as a function of latitude (R2 = 0.91). The photographs show the differences in size of males and females of three representative localities (numbered according to Table 2). Black bars indicate 10 cm. The map is own elaboration

Rhinella atacamensis has a notable geographic variation in body size and color pattern [44,45,46,47,48]. Almost 60 years ago, the first studies of the populations in the extreme north of its range revealed differences among them in both coloration and sexual dimorphism (less evident in the Paposo population), and in body size [43, 44]. The degree of intraspecific variation in coloration and body size is even greater when populations south of the distribution are considered (Coquimbo Region, ~ 30–32°S [47, 51]). The adults of the southern populations are larger and have different dorsal coloration ([46], represented by individuals of locality 9 in Fig. 1B) than those of the extreme north, different enough for Cei [43, 44] to consider them a different species (R. arunco) in his seminal studies of the genus Bufo in Chile (now Rhinella). Nowadays, the taxonomic status of the species is clear [50] and its geographic distribution with respect to its sister species (R. arunco) is better known [45], but the amount and form of the variation of body size (e.g. clinal pattern or discrete groups) has not been studied in its entire distribution.

The high level of phenotypic variation among the populations of R. atacamensis, which are distributed along an extensive aridity gradient, offers an interesting opportunity to study the causes of intraspecific body size variation in amphibians. Firstly, geographic variation of body size in this species is described through its entire distribution range. Then, using data from representative localities and an information-theoretic approach, we evaluate the predictions derived from the hypotheses related to water availability as the principal mechanism. However, since body size is a complex trait and its geographic variation may be influenced by multiple factors [1], hypotheses involving temperature, resource availability and seasonality (Table 1) are also considered. We hypothesize that precipitation will be the main predictor of body size in the Atacama toad, considering that this factor becomes limiting towards the north of its current distribution (Fig. 1A) and the antiquity of the aridity gradient where this species is distributed.

Results

The overall mean of the snout-vent length (SVL) of the 315 adult individuals (190 males, 125 females) was 84 mm (S.D. = 13.2 mm); mean SVL was 83.2 mm (± 13.9 mm) in males and 85.1 mm (± 12 mm) in females, which were not significantly different (W = 10.382; p = 0.0591). Student’s t-tests showed that there are differences between male and female SVL in five locations, where females were larger (Table 1 in Additional file 2). The smallest mean SVL for males and females was found in Las Breas (65.4 and 67.8 mm, respectively) and the largest mean SVL for males and females was in Canela Alta (102.5 mm and 109.1 mm, respectively; Table 1 in Additional file 2). It should be noted that there was no overlap in the ranges measured in these two localities, and that there is only a small overlap in the ranges of the extreme localities (Paposo and Palquial) (Table 2). In all localities (except Mostazal) the smallest sizes correspond to males, while the largest individuals were always females (except Paposo; Table 1 in Additional file 2).

Table 2 Sample sizes, body size (mean snout-vent length, SVL ± standard deviation, S.D.), range of SVL, mean annual precipitation (Pp) and coordinates of the sampled localities of Rhinella atacamensis, ordered from north to south

Model II regression did not show a significative difference from the isometric slope (Fig. 2; slope = 0.979, p = 0.725), indicating that the degree of sexual dimorphism does not change with body size. Therefore, males and females show a similar pattern of decrease of body size with latitude (Table 1 in Additional file 2). Considering this, and that the aim was to assess the pattern of variation in body size at the species level, regardless of sex, Fig. 1B shows the relationship between mean body size of total data (both sexes) by locality and latitude.

Fig. 2
figure2

Model II regression of mean body size (snout-vent length, SVL) of males on females of Rhinella atacamensis. Circles represent the combined means of males and females per locality. The red line indicates isometry (slope equal to 1). The black line is the model II regression slope (slope = 0.979, p = 0.725). Localities are numbered according to Table 2

A clear pattern of decrease in SVL was observed northwards of the species distribution (R2 = 0.91, slope = 4.92), which is consistent with a Bergmann’s body size cline (Fig. 1B). According to Moran’s I, body size was positively autocorrelated at short distances and negatively at long distances grouping sexes by locality (Fig. 3) and considering each sex separately (Figs. 1 and 2 in Additional file 2), which indicates that only nearby populations had similar body size. This is concordant with the pattern of clinal geographic variation observed in Fig. 1B.

Fig. 3
figure3

Spatial correlograms of Moran’s I of adult mean SVL (grey circles and lines) and the residuals of the best model (black circles and lines) for eights distance classes (in kilometers). Red filled circles indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05)

The best model ranked with AICc for all data by locality (Table 3) and the best one considering each sex separately (Table 1 in Additional file 2) included only mean annual precipitation (BIO12) as predictor. In each of these analyses, the mean annual precipitation alone explains over 73% of the body size variation (Table 3 and Table 2 in Additional file 2). The residuals of these models were not spatially autocorrelated (Monte Carlo permutation test, p < 0.05), indicating that there are no biases in our results.

Table 3 Linear regression models of climate variables on body size of adult males and females of Rhinella atacamensis (mean snout-vent length by locality), ranked by the values of AICc, from the best to the worst model

In addition, the second-best models of the pooled and sex-separated data by locality included the variable BIO12 together with the potential evapotranspiration (PET) (Table 3 and Table 2 in Additional file 2). Therefore, the main bioclimatic variable to explain the variation in body size in R. atacamensis, regardless of sex, is precipitation (Fig. 1 in Additional file 2). In fact, the linear regression of Fig. 4 shows that precipitation explains an important part of body size variation in the species (R2 = 0.76, p < 0.01).

Fig. 4
figure4

Linear regression of mean annual precipitation on mean adult body size of the 11 localities of Rhinella atacamensis studied. The grey area indicates the 95% prediction interval of the mean. Localities are numbered according to Table 2 with red numbers

In general, very similar results were obtained with the data grouped or separated by sex, so only those obtained with all the data are described below. The first and second models explained a substantial amount of evidence (0.39 and 0.30, respectively), which indicates that both models provide similar support to the data [55]. According to evidence ratios, the best model was 1.32 and 4.73 times more probable than the second and third highest ranked models. Considering the independent contribution of each environmental variable, mean annual precipitation explained 42% of the body size variability of Atacama toad, followed by NDVI with 31.2% (Fig. 5). All results of analyses for each sex are shown in the Additional file 2.

Fig. 5
figure5

Percentage of independent effect of the five environmental variables included in the 32 models evaluated, calculated using hierarchical partition. The environmental variables are: mean annual temperature (BIO1), temperature seasonality (BIO4), mean annual precipitation (BIO12), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and potential evapotranspiration (PET)

Discussion

Previous inter and intraspecific studies on geographic variation in amphibians have shown that they respond to water restrictions imposed by driest habitats through an increasing of body size [22, 28, 29, 34, 36, 37, 55, 56]. In contrast, our results show a pattern of decreasing of body size in R. atacamensis northward of its distribution, as the environment becomes more arid (Fig. 1A). Moreover, this pattern fits a Bergmann’s size cline (Fig. 1B). Therefore, we corroborate the observations of Cei [43, 44] in the northern part of the species distribution, where a clinal increase with latitude was described, and we show that this pattern extends throughout its entire distribution and is directly associated with precipitation (Fig. 4 and Fig. 1 in Additional file 2). The presence of this variable in the best models (Table 3; see results separated by sex in Table 1 in Additional file 2) and its high independent effect (Fig. 5) favor the converse water availability hypothesis (Table 1). Moreover, the results show that there is an isometric pattern of sexual dimorphism (no evidence of Rensch’s rule [54], Fig. 2) and that both males and females have responded identically to the decreasing of precipitation northwards of the species distribution (Fig. 1 in Additional file 2).

Considering the biogeographic scenario of R. atacamensis, the activity of this species towards the north of its distribution would be lower due to the increase in aridity, impacting negatively in its foraging time, resulting in smaller body sizes. Experimental evidence in ectothermic vertebrates points in the same direction. Foraging activity is limited in conditions of lower environmental humidity [57], as well as less efficient [58], which in turn affects net energy gain with a subsequent low growth rate [59]. In fact, the reduction in the foraging efficiency and activity would explain the dwarfism in two species of terrestrial toads that inhabit sandy substrates [60]. Furthermore, models predict that when growth rate is reduced by a decrease in food quality, body size also decreases [61]. For example, limited activity and foraging opportunities in Pelobates cultripes resulted in a lower grow rate and smaller body sizes [62]. Similar patterns have been observed in a snake species [63] that inhabits arid regions, but in this case the explanation have been focused on food availability more than foraging abilities. Both explanations are related and, although they possess different underlying mechanisms (Table 1), both may be affecting the Atacama toad in a non-exclusive way. In this species, the NDVI is positively related to body size, it has the second largest independent effect (Fig. 5) and it is included in the third best model in the AICc ranking (Table 3). Considering this variable, the decrease in foraging activity in the Atacama toad could be affected at the same time by a reduction in foraging area and/or food supply.

The preponderance of precipitation as the main predictor of body size in R. atacamensis is consistent with previous intraspecific studies of amphibians that inhabit arid regions and precipitation gradients [22, 34, 36, 37, 55, 56]. However, a converse pattern of body size variation, like that exhibited by the Atacama toad, rarely has been described in amphibians. Interestingly, one of the few examples comes from a co-distributed species (from 27°S to the south), Pleurodema thaul [64]. In that study, the pattern was explained arguing that higher minimum temperatures and lower precipitation northwards of its distribution would have reduced hydroperiods, resulting in small postmetamorphic sizes [64]. This mechanism seems less plausible for R. atacamensis because temperature was not an important bioclimatic variable to explain its variation of body size (BIO1 in Table 3 and Fig. 5), but could be a non-exclusive explanation. However, the parallel pattern in these co-distributed species provides an important opportunity to investigate in a common garden design the ultimate causes of body size variation of both species [65]. In addition, the parallel patterns in sympatric populations of different species suggest that these clines may be adaptive [66], suggesting that similar processes could be producing them.

The converse pattern described in the present study suggests that the response does not directly involve the water economy (i.e. water availability and conservation) as expected under an aridity gradient. Thus, other ecological processes could be affecting the body size variation or could even be more important than the effect of water conservation [67]. Although very little is known about the natural history of R. atacamensis, there are some aspects of habitat and behavior that could be important in this context. Populations in the northern distribution of the species (north of 29°30’S) inhabit mainly isolated streams with permanent flow [45] and have associated behaviors such as hiding under rocks in running water or near the edges [44]. The species also has nocturnal habits [68], which allows it to avoid the greater dehydration rates produced by diurnal temperatures [35]. The lack of evidence in favor of hypotheses related to temperature and water economy suggests that this type of explanation is important in the case of R. atacamensis (Table 3).

Data collected in the present study allowed to evaluate sex differences through the entire distribution the R. atacamensis. Although it was not the principal aim of this study, we were able to reevaluate some conclusions from the seminal studies of Cei [43, 44] and to compare them with new studies [68]. For instance, the sexual dimorphism skewed towards females found in Llanos de Challe (28°S [68]) was confirmed. However, the pattern of sexual dimorphism is isometric when comparing populations of all its distribution (Fig. 2). The differences in sexual dimorphism between localities could be reflecting different processes occurring at microhabitat level [69, 70] or could be due to the low number of samples in some localities (see Table 1 in Additional file 2). To evaluate this possibility at different spatial scales, we recommend using a substantially larger number of samples of both sexes and carrying out field studies such as that of Pincheira-Donoso et al. [68] in other localities. We highlight that even with differences between some localities (Table 1 in Additional file 2), the pattern of variation in body size through the precipitation gradient was found to be similar in both sexes (Fig. 1 in Additional file 2) and that the same ecogeographic hypothesis explained the pattern regardless of sex (Table 1 in Additional file 2).

Although correlations and explicit evaluation of multiple hypotheses are useful to identify the environmental factors that may be modulating the variation of traits such as body size, experimental studies are required to determine the underlying mechanisms and directly evaluate the genetic component of geographic variation [65]. However, the historical persistence of the aridity gradient, directly linked to the antiquity of the Atacama Desert, the parallel clinal pattern exhibited by P. thaul [64] and the ancestral distribution of R. atacamensis inferred by the distribution of its sister species R. arunco, which replaces it to the south (~ 32–38°S [46, 47]), suggest that the body size cline of R. atacamensis would have been an adaptive response to more arid conditions as its populations expanded further north. In fact, the current distribution ranges of both sister species allow giving a spatial direction to the process of body size decreasing in R. atacamensis but the time frame in which this process occurred is unknown.

Conclusion

We described an intraspecific clinal pattern of geographic variation in body size contrary to that expected according to the literature of amphibians that are distributed in desert or semidesert environments. This is the clearest example of this type of cline (i.e., Bergmann’s size cline) described so far in amphibians, as well as the only case where the converse water availability hypothesis is favored; it should be noted that these results are independent of sex.

Moreover, this is the first study in amphibians that inhabit desert and/or semidesert environments where the putative mechanisms (i.e., ecogeographic hypotheses) were explicitly evaluated in an approach of multiple competing hypotheses. Hence, the converse water availability hypothesis emerges as an alternative to the water availability hypothesis, showing that amphibians can respond in different ways to cope with water restrictions imposed by arid environments.

Methods

Sampling

The SVL of 315 adults of R. atacamensis from 11 representative localities of its entire distribution were measured (Fig. 1A). Most measurements were made in situ by the same person (individuals were measured, photographed, and released at the capture sites), but specimens from the DBGUCH (Universidad de Chile) and MZUC (Universidad de Concepción) collections were also included. Measurements were made with a digital caliper with 0.01 mm precision and then were rounded to one decimal place. The field campaigns were performed during the reproductive season, which takes place over a few weeks between August and November, depending on the location (C. Correa and M. Méndez, personal observations). The searches for the individuals generally began a few minutes before the sunset (approximately at 19:30 h), lasting until midnight. The southern limit of the distribution of R. atacamensis is not clear, since around 32°S there is a zone of hybridization with its sister species R. arunco [49], thus sampling was extended only to the Choapa River watershed (Palquial) to include only pure populations of R. atacamensis. Individuals were sampled in each locality in the same stream system within a maximum distance of 4 km (Palquial), except for Llanos de Challe, in which we included a few individuals from another site 22.5 km east (Canto del Agua) located in the same watershed. The sampled localities are shown on the map in Fig. 1 within a dashed line that represents the approximate distribution range of the species. This map was prepared by the authors using the QGIS program [71]. The sex and maturity of the individuals were determined using external characters and the presence (males) or absence of vocal activity. Adult males have nuptial pads on fingers one and two of the forelimbs, and generally have yellowish background color and smooth skin. Adult females generally have a whitish color with marked dark patches, skin with small spines in the dorsal area and more robust contexture [43, 44]. Data used in this study are show in Additional file 1.

Statistical analyses

Data normality was tested by sex, locality, and for each sex by locality with Shapiro–Wilk tests. Then, because the data of males and females were not normally distributed (Shapiro–Wilk of males: W = 0.941, p < 0.05; females: W = 0.964; p < 0.05), we examined sexual dimorphism in all samples using Mann–Whitney U tests. Differences in SVL of males and females within each locality were evaluated with Student’s t-tests. In addition, to evaluate how the degree of sexual dimorphism varies with body size, a major axis regression (model II) was performed fitting the log10 of mean body size of males and females [72]. This was compared to a slope equal to one, which represents the null hypothesis of isometry. The model II regression was performed in the smatr package [73]. This analysis also allowed us to evaluate another ecogeographical rule, Rensch’s rule [54].

Mean, minimum and maximum SVL for each locality were found to be highly correlated in all comparisons between pairs of variables (Pearson’s r > 0.89, p < 0.001), thus it was decided to use only the mean SVL in analyses. This allows comparison with studies of other anuran species, since mean SVL has often been used in studies of intraspecific geographic variation of body size (e.g. [52, 74]). Only the data from locality of Los Pajaritos was not normally distributed (W = 0.932, p = 0.04). Then, a linear model using mean SVL by locality and latitude as variables was obtained to evaluate the form and magnitude of geographic variation of body size in R. atacamensis.

Environmental variables and hypotheses testing

Geographic coordinates of each locality were used to obtain the climatic variables from the climate surfaces constructed by [75]. These surfaces were constructed with monthly temperatures and precipitation from 1950 to 2000; they are available with a spatial resolution of 1 km2. The relation between the environmental variables and body size was analyzed to determine which variable better explains the geographic variation of body size, as shown in Table 1. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) provides values which are highly correlated with photosynthetic mass and primary productivity [76]. The NDVI data, available with a spatial resolution of 30 arcseconds, were downloaded from [77]. Then, the maximum NDVI for each locality was obtained. Potential evapotranspiration (PET) was obtained from the CGIAR-CSI Soil–Water Balance Database [78] according to the proposal of [29]. The package Raster 3.4.5 [79] was used to extract the values of the climate variables.

We used an information-theoretic approach [80] to identify the potential mechanisms that have produced the geographic variation of body size in R. atacamensis. For this, bioclimatic data, NDVI and PET were used as predictor variables, generating 32 candidate models of simple linear regression (multiple with more than one predictor) for each of the six hypotheses (Table 3), considering all possible combinations of bioclimatic variables (excluding interactions). The models were evaluated using the Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small sample sizes (AICc [81]) and comparing the AICc value of each model with the minimum AICc (∆AICc) [80]. Rule of thumb was applied as suggested by [81] to report the best models, which indicates that models have considerably less support (∆AICc < 7) or substantial support (∆AICc < 2). We also used the Akaike weights (AICw) to evaluate the uncertainty of each model [80]. Evidence ratios were included to compare the relative likelihood of the models (wa/wb; where wis the likelihood of model a and wis that of model b [82]). Considering that male and female may respond differently to climatic variables (e.g. [23]), the AIC analyses were performed also by sex.

The relative contribution of the environmental factors on body size was assessed with an analysis of hierarchical partitioning [83, 84] considering mean of body size of all data (males and females) by locality. This analysis allows independent identification of the percentage of variation explained by each causal factor [83, 85, 86], eliminating the problems produced by multi-collinearity. For this we used the package hier.part 1.0.4 [87].

Spatial autocorrelation of body size and residuals of the best model were assessed using Moran’s I with a Monte Carlo permutation test with 199 permutations for significance evaluation, which was done using the package ncf 1.2.9 [88]. Then, spatial correlograms were created for eight distance classes for each sex and total data by locality. All analyses were performed in the R program (version 4.0.3) [89].

Availability of data and materials

Dataset used in this study are available in Additional file 1.

Abbreviations

SVL:

Snout-vent length

BIO1:

Bioclimatic variable 1

BIO4:

Bioclimatic variable 4

BIO12:

Bioclimatic variable 12

PET:

Potential evapotranspiration

NDVI:

Normalized Difference Vegetation Index

S.D.:

Standard Deviation

Pp:

Mean annual precipitation

AICc:

Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small sample size

K:

Number of parameters

AICw:

Akaike weights

MZUC:

Museo de Zoología de la Universidad de Concepción

DBGUCH:

Herpetological Collection of the Departamento de Biología Celular y Genética of the Universidad de Chile

References

  1. 1.

    Gould SJ, Johnston RF. Geographic variation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1972;3:457–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thorpe RS. Geographic variation: a synthesis of cause, data, pattern and congruence in relation to subspecies, multivariate analysis and phylogenesis. Ital J Zool. 1987;54(1):3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lomolino MV, Riddle BR, Brown JH. Biogeography. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gaston KJ, Chown SL, Evans KL. Ecogeographical rules: elements of a synthesis. J Biogeogr. 2008;35:483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Atkinson D, Sibly RM. Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends Ecol Evol. 1997;12:235–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Roff D. The Evolution of Life Histories. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bergmann C. Ueber die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien. 1847;3:595–708.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mayr E. Geographic character gradients and climatic adaptation. Evolution. 1956;10:105–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ashton KG, Tracy MC, Queiroz A. Is Bergmann’s rule valid for mammals? Am Nat. 2000;156:390–415.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ashton KG. Do amphibians follow Bergmann’s rule? Can J Zool. 2002;80:708–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ashton KG. Patterns of within-species body size variation of birds: strong evidence for Bergmann’s rule. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2002;11:505–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ashton KG, Feldman CR. Bergmann’s rule in nonavian reptiles: turtles follow it, lizards and snakes reverse it. Evolution. 2003;57:1151–63.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Belk MC, Houston DD. Bergmann’s rule in ectotherms: a test using freshwater fishes. Am Nat. 2002;160:803–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Adams DC, Church JO. Amphibians do not follow Bergmann’s rule. Evolution. 2008;2008(62):413–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Clauss M, Dittmann MT, Müller DW, Meloro C, Codron D. Bergmann’s rule in mammals: a cross-species interspecific pattern. Oikos. 2014;122:1465–72.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Loder N. Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of Bergmann’s rule. Divers Distrib. 1999;5:165–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Meiri S, Thomas GH. The geography of body size–challenges of the interspecific approach. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2007;16:689–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Watt C, Mitchell S, Salewski V. Bergmann’s rule; a concept cluster? Oikos. 2010;119(1):89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Watt C, Salewski V. Bergmann’s rule encompasses mechanism: a reply to Olalla-Tárraga (2011). Oikos. 2011;120(10):1445–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Olalla-Tárraga MÁ, Rodríguez MÁ, Hawkins BA. Broad-scale patterns of body size in squamate reptiles of Europe and North America. J Biogeogr. 2006;33:781–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Olalla-Tárraga MÁ, Rodríguez MÁ. Energy and interspecific body size patterns of amphibian faunas in Europe and North America: anurans follow Bergmann’s rule, urodeles its converse. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2007;16:606–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nevo E. Adaptive variation in size of cricket frogs. Ecology. 1973;54:1271–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ficetola GF, Scali S, Denoël M, Montinaro G, Vukov TD, Zuffi MA, Padoa-Schioppa E. Ecogeographical variation of body size in the newt Triturus carnifex: comparing the hypotheses using an information-theoretic approach. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2010;19:485–95.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rosenzweig ML. The strategy of body size in mammalian carnivores. Am Midl Nat. 1968;80:299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mousseau TA. Ectotherms follow the converse to Bergmann’s rule. Evolution. 1997;51:630–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Morrison C, Hero JM. Geographic variation in life-history characteristics of amphibians: a review. J Anim Ecol. 2003;72:270–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM. A critique for macroecology. Oikos. 1999;84:353–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gouveia SF, Dobrovolski R, Lemes P, Cassemiro FA, Diniz-Filho JAF. Environmental steepness, tolerance gradient, and ecogeographical rules in glassfrogs (Anura: Centrolenidae). Biol J Linn Soc. 2013;108(4):773–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gouveia SF, Correia I. Geographical clines of body size in terrestrial amphibians: water conservation hypothesis revisited. J Biogeogr. 2016;43:2075–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Pincheira-Donoso D, Meiri S, Jara M, Olalla-Tárraga MA, Hodgson DJ. Global patterns of body size evolution are driven by precipitation in legless amphibians. Ecography. 2019;42:1682–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Navas CA, Antoniazzi MM, Jared CA. A preliminary assessment of anuran physiological and morphological adaptation to the Caatinga, a Brazilian semi-arid environment. Int Congr Ser. 2005;1275:298–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Olalla-Tárraga MÁ, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bastos RP, Rodríguez MÁ. Geographic body size gradients in tropical regions: water deficit and anuran body size in the Brazilian Cerrado. Ecography. 2009;32:581–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Guo C, Lu X. Lifestyle-based approaches provide insights into body size variation across environmental gradients in anurans. Evol Biol. 2016;43:208–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Guo C, Gao S, Krzton A, Zhang L. Geographic body size variation of a tropical anuran: effects of water deficit and precipitation seasonality on Asian common toad from southern Asia. BMC Evol Biol. 2019;19(1):208.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ward D. The Biology of Deserts. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Amor N, Farjallah S, Said K. Morphometric variation in the Tunisian green frog Rana saharica Anura: Ranidae. Afr Zool. 2009;44:194–203.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Amor N, Farjallah S, Ben-Yacoub S, Merella P, Khaled S. Morphological variation of the African green toad, Bufo boulengeri (Amphibia: Anura) in Tunisia. Pak J Zool. 2011;43(5):921–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Clarke JDA. The antiquity of the aridity in the Chilean Atacama Desert. Geomorphology. 2006;73:101–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Dunai TJ, López GA, Juez-Larré J. Oligocene/Miocene age of aridity in the Atacama Desert revealed by exposure dating of erosion sensitive landforms. Geology. 2005;33:321–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Villagrán C, Hinojosa LF. Esquema biogeográfico de Chile. In: Llorente-Bousquets J, Morrone JJ, editors. Regionalización Biogeográfica en Iberoamérica y Tópicos Afines. Mexico City: Ediciones de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2005. p. 551–77.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Armesto JJ, Vidiella PE, Gutiérrez JR. Plant communities of the fog-free coastal desert of Chile: plant strategies in a fluctuating environment. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 1993;66:271–82.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Luebert F, Pliscoff P. Sinopsis Bioclimática y Vegetacional de Chile. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cei JM. Bufo arunco (Molina) y las formas chilenas de Bufo spinulosus Wiegmann. Invest Zool Chilenas. 1962;7:59–81.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Cei JM. Batracios de Chile. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad de Chile; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Correa C, Sallaberry M, Jara-Arancio P, Lobos G, Soto ER, Méndez MA. Amphibia, Anura, Bufonidae, Rhinella atacamensis: altitudinal distribution extension, new records and geographic distribution map. Check List. 2008;4:478–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Correa CL, Méndez MA, Veloso A, Sallaberry M. Genetic and Reproductive evidence of natural hybridization between the sister species Rhinella atacamensis and Rhinella arunco (Anura, Bufonidae). J Herpetol. 2012;46:568–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Correa C, Mendez MA, Araya S, Lobos G, Palma RE. A hybrid zone of two toad sister species, emopenrhinella atacamensisemclose and emopenr aruncoemclose Anura: bufonidae, defined by a consistent altitudinal segregation in watersheds. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 2013;86:115–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lobos G, Vidal M, Correa C, Labra A, Díaz-Páez H, Charrier A, Rabanal F, Díaz S, Tala C. Anfibios de Chile, un Desafío para la Conservación. Santiago: Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Fundación Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias de la Universidad de Chile y Red Chilena de Herpetología; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Sallaberry M, Soto E, Correa C, Méndez MA. Geographic distribution: Bufo atacamensis (Atacama Toad; Sapo de Rulo). Herpetol Rev. 2007;38(2):214.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Pramuk JB. Phylogeny of south American Bufo (Anura: Bufonidae) inferred from combined evidence. Zool J Linn Soc. 2006;146(3):407–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zug GR, Vitt L, Caldwell JP. Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Valenzuela-Sánchez A, Cunningham AA, Soto-Azat C. Geographic body size variation in ectotherms: effects of seasonality on an anuran from the southern temperate forest. Front Zool. 2015;12:37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Angilletta MJ Jr, Dunham AE. The temperature-size rule in ectotherms: simple evolutionary explanations may not be general. Am Nat. 2003;162:332–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Liao WB, Chen W. Inverse Rensch’s rule in a frog with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Sci Nat. 2012;99(5):427–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kutrup B, Bulbul U, Yilmaz N. Effects of the ecological conditions on morphological variations of the green toad, Bufo viridis, in Turkey. Ecol Res. 2006;21:208–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Oyamaguchi HM, Oliveira E, Smith TB. Environmental drivers of body size variation in the lesser treefrog (Dendropsophus minutus) across the Amazon-Cerrado gradient. Biol J Linn Soc. 2017;120:363–70.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Feder ME, Londos PL. Hydric constraints upon foraging in a terrestrial salamander, Desmognathus ochrophaeus (Amphibia: Plethodontidae). Oecologia. 1984;64:413–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Gomez-Mestre I, Tejedo M. Adaptation or exaptation? An experimental test of hypotheses on the origin of salinity tolerance in Bufo calamita. J Evol Biol. 2005;18(4):847–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Huey RB, Kingsolver JG. Climate warming, resource availability, and the metabolic meltdown of ectotherms. Am Nat. 2019;194:E140–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Marangoni F, Mestre-Tejedo Gomez M. Extreme reduction in body size and reproductive output associated with sandy substrates in two anuran species. Amphibia Reptilia. 2008;29(4):541–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Berrigan D, Charnov EL. Reaction norms for age and size at maturity in response to temperature: a puzzle for life historians. Oikos. 1994;70(3):474–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Leclair MH, Leclair R, Gallant J. Application of skeletochronology to a population of Pelobates cultripes (Anura: Pelobatidae) from Portugal. J Herpetol. 2005;39(2):199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Amarello M, Nowak EM, Taylor EN, Schuett GW, Repp RA, Rosen PC, Hardy DL Sr. Potential environmental influences on variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism among Arizona populations of the western diamond-backed rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox). J Arid Environ. 2010;74:1443–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Rivas J, Quiero A, Penna M, Velásquez NA. Body-size variation across environmental gradients in an ectothermic organism: An intraspecific approach to ecogeographic patterns. Herpetologica. 2018;74:191–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Guillaumet A, Ferdy J, Desmarais E, Godelle B, Crochet P. Testing Bergmann’s rule in the presence of potentially confounding factors: a case study with three species of Galerida larks in Morocco. J Biogeogr. 2008;35:579–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Endler JA. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Gouveia SF, Bovo RP, Rubalcaba JG, Da Silva FR, Maciel NM, Andrade DV, Martinez PA. Biophysical modeling of water economy can explain geographic gradient of body size in anurans. Am Nat. 2019;193(1):51–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Pincheira-Donoso D, Bachrati C, Cotter S, Brandreth E, Cole J, Daly E, King C, et al. Field observations on the natural history and breeding behavior of the Atacama toad Rhinella atacamensis, (Anura: Bufonidae) from Chile. Bol Mus Nac Hist Nat. 2018;67:25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Shine R. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Q Rev Biol. 1989;64(4):419–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Blanckenhorn WU, Stillwell RC, Young KA, Fox CW, Ashton KG. When Rensch meets Bergmann: does sexual size dimorphism change systematically with latitude? Evolution. 2006;60:2004–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    QGIS Development team. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Fairbairn DJ. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 1997;28(1):659–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Warton DI, Duursma RA, Falster DS, Taskinen S. smatr 3 - an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;3(2):257–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Boaratti AZ, Rodrigues-Da Silva FR. Relationships between environmental gradients and geographic variation in the intraspecific body size of three species of frogs (Anura). Austral Ecol. 2015;40:869–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Pliscoff P, Luebert F, Hilger HH, Guisan A. Effects of alternative sets of climatic predictors on species distribution models and associated estimates of extinction risk: A test with plants in an arid environment. Ecol Model. 2014;288:166–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Pettorelli N, Vik JO, Mysterud A, Gaillard JM, Tucker CJ, Stenseth NC. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20:503–10.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Vuolo F, Mattiuzzi M, Klisch A, Atzberger C. Data service platform for MODIS Vegetation Indices time series processing at BOKU Vienna: current status and future perspectives. Proc SPIE 8538, Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications III:85380A. 2012.

  78. 78.

    Trabucco A, Zomer RJ, 2010. Global high-resolution soil-water balance geospatial database. CGIAR-CSI GeoPortal. Available at: http://www.cgiarcsi.community. Accessed 19 Dec 2019.

  79. 79.

    Hijmans RJ, Etten JV. Raster: geographic analysis and modeling with raster data. R package version 2.0–05. 2012.

  80. 80.

    Anderson DR, Burnham KP. Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods. J Wildl Manage. 2002;66(3):912–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Lukacs PM, Thompson WL, Kendall WL, Gould WR, Doherty PF Jr, Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Concerns regarding a call for pluralism of information theory and hypothesis testing. J Appl Ecol. 2007;44:456–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Chevan A, Sutherland S. Hierarchical partitioning. Am Stat. 1991;45:90–6.

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Olea PP, Mateo-Tomas P, De Frutos Á. Estimating and modelling bias of the hierarchical partitioning public-domain software: implications in environmental management and conservation. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e11698.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Mac NR. Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models. Biodivers Conserv. 2000;9:655–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Mac NR. Multiple regression and inference in ecology and conservation biology: further comments on identifying important predictor variables. Biodivers Conserv. 2002;11:1397–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Walsh C, Mac Nally R. Package hier. part: hierarchical partitioning. R package version 1.0–4. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Bjornstad ON, Bjornstad MON. Package “ncf”. Spatial nonparametric covariance functions. R package version 1.2.9. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to David Espinoza, Jesús Morales, Sergio Araya, for their assistance with the field work. We also thank Pablo Fibla for his help in measuring some specimens. Claudio Correa thanks support of scholarship AT-24071045 and projects Fondecyt 3110040 (post-doctoral) and 79130032 (PAI). Felipe Durán thanks financial support of grant CONICYT-PFCHA/Magister Nacional/2018-22181389. Finally, we thank Florencio Quispe and Rosa Concha from Vega Cebollar, Eleuterio Rodríguez, Elsa González and Lenin Rodríguez from Los Pajaritos, and Verónica León from Canto del Agua for allowing us to study the individuals of Atacama toads inside their properties.

Funding

Partially funded by post-doctoral project Fondecyt 3110040. The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.D. and C.C. designed the study. F.D., M.M., and C.C., collected the data. F.D. conducted the analyses. F.D. and C.C wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Correa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission for animal use was provided by Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero under permit #0047/2011.

Consent for publication

Not applicable for this research.

Competing interests

Authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Raw data used in this study.

Additional file 2

. Results of the analyses by sex.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durán, F., Méndez, M.A. & Correa, C. The Atacama toad (Rhinella atacamensis) exhibits an unusual clinal pattern of decreasing body size towards more arid environments. BMC Zool 6, 25 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40850-021-00090-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bergmann’s cline
  • Ectotherm
  • Atacama Desert
  • Aridity gradient
  • Information-theoretic approach
  • Converse water availability hypothesis