Skip to main content

Table 8 Comparative morphology of selected freshwater Frontonia species

From: The neotypification of Frontonia vernalis (Ehrenberg, 1833) Ehrenberg, 1838 and the description of Frontonia paravernalis sp. nov. trigger a critical revision of frontoniid systematics

Characters

F. leucas sensu Foissner

F. leucas

Italy, Neotype

F. leucas India

F. leucas Turkey

F. paramagna China

F. paramagna India

F. angusta Neotype

F. angusta Turkey

Average body length (μm)

250

180

173

335

341

293

116

170

Cytostome/body length ratio

1/5–1/8

1/7

1/6

1/8–1/9

1/10

1/10

1/5

1/4

Somatic kineties, number

115

104

100

187

180–200

166–208

94

105

Peniculi (I, II, III), number

4–5, 4–5, 4–5

5, 5, 5

5, 5, 5

4–5, 4–5, 4–5

4, 4, 4

4, 4, 4

5–4, 3, 2

4–5, 4–5, 4–5

Vestibular kineties, number

3

3

3

3

3

3

4

3

Postoral kineties, number

6

5–6

6

6–8

6–7

6–7

4

4–6

Micronuclei, number

2–9

2–3

2–4

1

8a

6–14

1

1

Micronuclei, size (μm)

ND

3–5

1.5–2

7–8a

ND

1.5–2.3

7a

5–8

CVC, number

~ 10

8–11

7–8

10–12

~ 15

10–14

Absent

Absent

CVC, structure

Long, twisted

Long, twisted

Long, twisted

Branched

Long, straight

Long, straight

Absent

Absent

PCV, number

1

1

1

1

1

1–3

2–4

1

References

[3, 4]

Present study

Present study

[25]

[15, 46]

Present study

[7]

[25]

  1. CV Contractile vacuole, CVC Canals of contractile vacuole, ND No Data, PCV Pores of contractile vacuole
  2. aAccording to figures